<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking Usability - how usable is usability?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.photolibrary.com/2009/05/19/how-usable-is-usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.photolibrary.com/2009/05/19/how-usable-is-usability/</link>
	<description>Photolibrary News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Notess</title>
		<link>http://news.photolibrary.com/2009/05/19/how-usable-is-usability/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Notess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.photolibrary.com/?p=407#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Hmm...more likely the future of advertising research and other high-stakes manipulation. I like to think of user experience work as happening in the service of the user's needs. Naively altruistic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;more likely the future of advertising research and other high-stakes manipulation. I like to think of user experience work as happening in the service of the user&#8217;s needs. Naively altruistic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photolibrary</title>
		<link>http://news.photolibrary.com/2009/05/19/how-usable-is-usability/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Photolibrary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.photolibrary.com/?p=407#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Thanks for you comment Mark. User experience practitioners have a lot to do with gaming and interactive digital media, with the complexity of websites today the same methods are just as relevant - especially in terms of social engagement. 

Interestingly, Marketing guru Martin Lindstrom talks about the limits of most testing methodologies, opting for fMRI scans (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging) as the most conclusive means of understanding why people are engaged in just about anything. Perhaps this is the future of usability testing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for you comment Mark. User experience practitioners have a lot to do with gaming and interactive digital media, with the complexity of websites today the same methods are just as relevant - especially in terms of social engagement. </p>
<p>Interestingly, Marketing guru Martin Lindstrom talks about the limits of most testing methodologies, opting for fMRI scans (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging) as the most conclusive means of understanding why people are engaged in just about anything. Perhaps this is the future of usability testing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Notess</title>
		<link>http://news.photolibrary.com/2009/05/19/how-usable-is-usability/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Notess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.photolibrary.com/?p=407#comment-46</guid>
		<description>It's true that usability (and usability methods) grew out of a task-oriented view of interaction, where tasks tended to be easily identifiable "get the computer to do this" type of activities, usually oriented around things management wanted workers to do on their jobs.

Note, however, that user-centered design methods quickly moved beyond this to encompass techniques providing a broader view, including social and environmental factors. Ethnographic methods and diary studies, for instance, can help uncover some of the identify construction and social engagement qualities of online interaction. 

The term "user experience" is often used instead of "usability" because people have a broader set of concerns in view. So the question is not just "can I get done what I need to do" but also "am I enjoying this enough to keep doing it." There are methods and practitioners out there that do this well. But it tends not to be called usability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that usability (and usability methods) grew out of a task-oriented view of interaction, where tasks tended to be easily identifiable &#8220;get the computer to do this&#8221; type of activities, usually oriented around things management wanted workers to do on their jobs.</p>
<p>Note, however, that user-centered design methods quickly moved beyond this to encompass techniques providing a broader view, including social and environmental factors. Ethnographic methods and diary studies, for instance, can help uncover some of the identify construction and social engagement qualities of online interaction. </p>
<p>The term &#8220;user experience&#8221; is often used instead of &#8220;usability&#8221; because people have a broader set of concerns in view. So the question is not just &#8220;can I get done what I need to do&#8221; but also &#8220;am I enjoying this enough to keep doing it.&#8221; There are methods and practitioners out there that do this well. But it tends not to be called usability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
